Thursday 10/3/2019 9:50 (holiday)
Magnificent morning on this holiday, bright and sunny, there is a slight chill in the air. So I think I decided that what or who I am taking to here is mostly my subconscious, with potentially a few insights coming from beyond. Nonetheless, when I do read some older posts, I am often quite surprised at how much these at least clarify something I am wondering about. No atter what, there is a deep pragmatic value in this, at least for me.
So Club, are you there?
The Club: No, you are doing quite well without us? (laughing).
“No,” and yet an answer comes.
You know what we mean. (smiling)
So what do you think about all this?
If it helps you, that is all that matters. We told you once, you can call us anything you want, Roxanne for that matter, or think of us any which way you want. Most likely it would be wrong anyways, laughing. So to see us as your subconscious, well, it is not wrong, but not quite right either.
OK, I just don’t want to “sell” this as anything beyond what it is.
You’re not selling anything (laughing). When you hook into us, interact with us, it is just what it is: a dialogue, a communication, with aspects of yourself that were previously hidden. So then “sell” it as a talk with your subconscious.
Because here is the key…
… I know, I just got the insight (as a thought-particle) from you, but I had this myself already a few days ago, which tends to solidify the thesis that I am merely talking to myself. Let me state it:
The term “subconscious” simply means “lower than consciousness,” lower than normal awareness. What exactly lower means, nobody can be clear of.
Exactly. So is that “subconscious” purely defined in your brain, or does it extend beyond the personal sphere? Nobody (human) can know. The materialistic view, of course, is it is just the brain, it cannot be anything else. The spiritual view is it reaches beyond, and the idealistic view even states it comes from beyond as its basis. We’d say, both materialistic and idealistic are wrong, as they hold one side higher than the other.
OK, we had that in churning.
So the point is, to say it is your subconscious you talk with, clearly that is correct [meaning, lower than conscious awarness]. And you won’t oversell it anybody that way.
What exactly the subconscious IS, that is an entirely different matter.
We laugh.So go ahead, call us subconscious.
[Noise from the street; big disturbance; trying to re-tune, it does not work ]
Anyways, I was drifting. So let’s then continue on this basis. I am grateful for the insights that come out as part of this process.
As I type this up, I was looking for a title for it. As first I had “Am I talking with my subconscious?” or similar, but then this came into my mind:
“Communicating through the subconscious”
which implies it is a layer in between, and leaves open where exactly the boundaries are.
I think that is a good expression of this session as any, or my experience in general for that matter.
It also leaves open the possibilities of the substratum of through, which had come up in previous talks.
Namaste — I bow to you and the Divine in you.
Copyright © Hanns-Oskar Porr